Pauli writes on the importance of a paper by Coester, published in: Physical review: 83 (1951), for the problem of the transition from neutral vector mesons to quantum electrodynamics. He explains the connection of this paper with that of four Japanese physicists, published in: Progress of theoretical physics: 6 (1951) on the possibiliy of avoiding indefinite metric in Hilbert-space in quantum electrodynamics.
Zonder titelZürich, Switzerland
941 Archivistische beschrijving results for Zürich, Switzerland
Pauli is glad that the problem of the vacuum expectation value of the product of three field operators has been further clarified. He talks about Beta decay. He is convinced that reflexion invariance prevails in nature against of Lee, Yang and Salam.
Zonder titelAddition to the last letter about Heisenberg's calculations.
Zonder titelPauli gives more calculations and questions about Heisenberg's formalism.
Zonder titelKällén replies to Pauli's last letter. The normal pertubation theory cannot be used in the case mentioned by Pauli.
Zonder titelPauli comments on a letter by Källén and his problem of two N-particles.
Zonder titelPauli gives a more precise formulation to the problem of dipole ghosts and an another solution. He also discusses approximation through complex roots.
Zonder titelPauli writes on a correspondence with Heisenberg on his ideas on field quantization.
Zonder titelPauli replies to Källén's letter of the 10 and the 12 January 1957. He talks about of his discussion with Fierz of the time-dependent solutions for dipole ghosts. Fierz criticizes Pauli's continuity argument for the S-matrix.
Zonder titelPauli writes of his reactions to the experiments showing parity violation. He gives reasons for his doubt of this possibility up to now. The main problem is now: why are the strong interactions reflexion-invariant? Pauli makes some general considerations on TCP-invariance.
Zonder titel