Heisenberg does not think that substraction physics makes sense. He writes about what he has learned of nuclear physics in Copenhagen, about the order of magnitude of exchange forces, and Bethe's suggestion to replace Fermi's relation for interaction by another. He writes about the explanation of all mass defects by a plausible exchange force and he belives that the theory of the positron and quantum electrodynamics should be brought in order before attacking nuclear problems.
Heisenberg, WernerPostcard
114 Archival description results for Postcard
Heisenberg writes of the results of his latest calculations. The non-linear interaction leads not only to the vanishing of the o-functions on the lightcone but also to vanishing of the transitions to the dipole states (limes of dipole ghosts).
Heisenberg, WernerHeisenberg writes about Pauli's coming to Copenhagen. He reports on his recent work.
Heisenberg, WernerHeisenberg replies to Pauli's letter. He is now satisfied with the state of the theory of holes. There are two problems. The first is what kind of Schrödinger equation characterizes the theory of holes and what are at any moment the expectation values for current and charge-density. The second problem is what are the expectation values for the energy-density. He discusses the solutions for both problems. If Pauli agrees, he would like to publish the theory of holes in the present form. He is grateful for Pauli's criticism of his attempts to solve the self-energy question.
Heisenberg, WernerHeisenberg talks of more progress about e$^{2}$(h.c.). He also writes of a solution of the Schrödinger equation in the present theory of holes by a power-series of e$^{2}$(h.c.).
Heisenberg, WernerHeisenberg suggests an outline for a common paper to be published by Pauli and himself.
Heisenberg, WernerJordan replies to a letter by Pauli. He discusses the problem of probability of mutations and of the statistical independence of successive mutations and the necessity for distinguishing between micro- and macro-evolution. He agrees with Pauli that nothing can be said at present about the time scale of evolutionary processes.
Jordan, PascualKällén thanks Pauli for an offprint of a paper by Pauli that is helpful for his calculations on the Lee model. He writes on the question of the unitary of the S-matrix in this model.
Källén, GunnarKlein wants Pauli to render his encyclopedia article consistent with Kottler's.
Klein, FelixMøller and Kristensen thank Pauli for his instructive letter. They answer the question he asked and give some details of their form factor theory.
Kristensen, P