Heisenberg resents the publicity given by the press to their work. He sends him by same mail an amended copy of the manuscript.
Sans titreWeisskopf writes about Heisenberg's talk on his theory and about the doubts on its results.
Sans titrePauli replies to some issues raised in de Shalit's letter of 6 March, including: strangeness; the role of particles with rest mass zero for the decrease in symmetry (group-invariance); the ^-conjugation formalism; and a "philosophical" problem.
Sans titrePauli says that the spinor model may be wrong, but Källén's considerations do not yet prove this as Pauli undertakes to demonstrate.
Sans titreEnz writes about a student's diploma work and about a discussion he had with R Jost on "associated production" of $\mu$ -mesons.
Sans titreWeisskopf comments on the copy of Pauli's letter to Landau. He expresses doubts on the introduction of two fields.
Sans titreVon Laue asks Pauli to contact Heisenberg concerning Heisenberg's contribution to the Max Planck centenary.
Sans titrePauli asks questions about the possibility of eliminating the concept of Lagrangian and the corresponding field equations from the formalism of quantized fields. He also writes about corresponding invariants.
Sans titrePauli writes to Heisenberg about a letter from Laue who thinks that at the "memorial meeting" for Planck one should talk about Planck and not about one's own work.
Sans titrePauli makes mathematical remarks about the particles resulting from a spinor model. He writes on the electrodynamical aspect of his calculations. He is against the publicity given by Heisenberg to his "world-formula".
Sans titre