Pauli writes about his interest in Touschek's remark at Padova and Venice about the derivation of C- and P-symmetry from special properties.
Zonder titelPauli makes critical comments on Fierz's last letter and his calculations. He writes on speculations about C-, P-, T-invariance. Possibly it is not the strength of the interaction but primarily its form which determines C-, P-, T-invariance.
Zonder titelFierz writes on further calculations concerning fields with spin. He makes some remarks on Heisenberg's treatment of the Lee-model.
Zonder titelPauli makes remarks on Misner's work: the Hamiltonian density cannot vanish, neither classically nor with quantization.
Zonder titelFierz gives a schematic description of the parity experiments. He makes theoretical comments on the Lee model.
Zonder titelPauli is against Heisenberg's approach to quantum electrodynamics. It is impossible to work only with energy-momentum values and the S-matrix and to disregard space and time. He talks about some clarifications on his own last letter but one. He writes on the separation of purely mathematical quantities from physically significant ones.
Zonder titelPauli replies to Lüders' letters of 8 Dec and 13 Dec about elementary particle theory.
Zonder titelPauli replies to Källén's letter of the 13 December 1957. Pauli agrees with him that the indefinite metric is the correct way. He talks about the macroscopic space-time description with complex roots and the Bisection of zero-states in parts corresponding to the upper and lower half-plane which must be connected with the difference between observed object and observing subject. By this bisection symmetric violations are introduced in a most natural way. He writes on his discussion with Heisenberg and on complex ghosts in weak interactions.
Zonder titelLüders reports that no exchange relations were overlooked in Pauli's lecture.
Zonder titelSymanzik replies to Pauli's question about dispersion relations for Lee's model.
Zonder titel