Pauli gives some more suggestions for formulation of their results.
Sin títuloPauli expresses satisfaction over Gürsey's idea to make the neutrino rather than the vacuum responsible for strangeness. He discusses several difficulties connected with the spinor-model.
Sin títuloHeisenberg resents the publicity given by the press to their work. He sends him by same mail an amended copy of the manuscript.
Sin títuloWeisskopf writes about Heisenberg's talk on his theory and about the doubts on its results.
Sin títuloPauli replies to some issues raised in de Shalit's letter of 6 March, including: strangeness; the role of particles with rest mass zero for the decrease in symmetry (group-invariance); the ^-conjugation formalism; and a "philosophical" problem.
Sin títuloPauli says that the spinor model may be wrong, but Källén's considerations do not yet prove this as Pauli undertakes to demonstrate.
Sin títuloEnz writes about a student's diploma work and about a discussion he had with R Jost on "associated production" of $\mu$ -mesons.
Sin títuloWeisskopf comments on the copy of Pauli's letter to Landau. He expresses doubts on the introduction of two fields.
Sin títuloVon Laue asks Pauli to contact Heisenberg concerning Heisenberg's contribution to the Max Planck centenary.
Sin título