Pauli writes about the congress in Pisa and his talks with Heisenberg. He talks about the Russian physicists. He recommends "Nuovo Cimento" instead of Phys. Rev. He talks about the doubts of Lehmann, Heisenberg's assistant and Heisenberg's work.
Pauli, WolfgangPauli writes about his plans for the summer and about the appointments of several colleagues.
Pauli, WolfgangPauli replies to Schafroth's letter. He talks about his results about an ideal gas of charged bosons. He makes a short comments on supra-conductivity, resonance-methods and about papers by Butler, Friedmann and Feynman.
Pauli, WolfgangPauli replies to Schafroth's letter of the 9th December 1954. He makes some "pedagogical" advice about contacts with colleagues. He makes critical comments on Schafroth's paper on "supra-conductivity of a charged ideal Bose-gas". He talks about a physical error in this paper.He agrees with Schafroth that the Bose-gas should be given more attention.
Pauli, WolfgangPauli comments about a talk with Fröhlich on Schafroth's results.
Pauli, WolfgangPauli replies to Schafroth's letter. He comments on supraconductivity. He writes about vacancies for theoretical physicists in Switzerland and about difficulties of burocracy. He talks about parity and conservation laws for light particles.
Pauli, WolfgangPauli writes about his common work with Heisenberg and the difficulties involved. He talks about a paper by Bogoljubow on supraconductivity of which Wentzel thinks highly.
Pauli, WolfgangPauli comments on Schafroth's preprint. He hopes that with Bogoljubow's and Wentzel's work one can arrive at a possible model for supraconductivity.
Pauli, WolfgangPauli talks about Schafroth's paper which interests him. He talks about his seminar on Pais' w-space.
Pauli, WolfgangPauli talks about Fröhlich's reaction to Schafroth's paper. He comments on Feynman's paper.
Pauli, Wolfgang