This postcard gives some details about Pauli's arrival in Denmark
Bohr, NielsBohr asks for Pauli's comments on his paper with Kramer and Slater and for suggestions on how to improve this text.
Bohr, NielsBohr has heard that Pauli developed new thoughts on the mystic of relativity in the atom theory and is asking for some developments.
Bohr, NielsBohr discusses Pauli's paper "Zs. Phys. : 31 (1925), pp.765" of which Pauli has sent a manuscript. The letters contains a long discussion of the electron groups and the periodic table. He also writes on fluorescence radiation.
Bohr, NielsBohr thanks Pauli for his beautiful paper. He wants to refer to it in a note.
Bohr, NielsBohr discusses the "Gospel of the magnetic electron". He writes that Kramers has confirmed Pauli and Heisenberg's calculations. Bohr is still hoping for a correspondence agreement. Kramers made a guess as to the relativistic and magnetic corrections, the relevant formulae are given in the letter.
Bohr, NielsThe letter encloses a paper by Jordan published in: Z. Phys. : 44 (1927), pp.473. Bohr discusses it briefly and refers also to Klein's work. Bohr has not yet finished a "small note". He refers to Pauli's visit.
Bohr, NielsBohr has sent proofs from Holland to Berlin for "Naturwissenschaften : 16 (1928), pp.245" but he is still expecting his last proofs. He hopes to see Pauli in Copenhagen. He has enjoyed seeing Kramers and Ehrenfest in Leiden. He is preparing his opposition to Jacobsen's thesis. Klein is still in Cambridge.
Bohr, NielsBohr encloses his paper for "Naturwissenschaften :16 (1928), pp.245" and expresses his gratitude for Pauli's help.
Bohr, NielsBohr writes that at the institute's birthday they all missed Pauli. Bohr's thoughts went out to the old collaborators, including Pauli, who supported him patiently in his endeavours. He thanks Pauli for the invitation to come to Zürich and to give a lecture. He heard through Gamow that Pauli was in Berlin, so he hopes that he will come to Copenhagen and have the opportunity to speak a little about physics. Bohr also writes that he thinks that he has reached a valid view diverging from Peierls' and Landau's scepticism. After Klein's departure, Bohr has found in Rosenfeld an excellent and sympathetic collaborator. He hopes in a few days to finish a small article that should please Pauli.
Bohr, Niels