Fierz replies to a letter by Pauli and makes some remarks on the $\beta$-decay. Fierz sent another letter on the same day including some corrections to this one (see letter fierz_0016-282r).
Sans titrePauli makes critical comments on Kofoed-Hansen's papers about the neutrino.
Sans titreFierz makes further remarks concerning a paper by Stückelberg.
Sans titrePauli discusses the philosophical duality realism-nominalism. He mentions that he is one of those who think that ideas have a reality at least as strong as that of sensations.
Sans titrePauli explains his use of the adjectives "positivistic", "realistic", "idealistic" and "phenomenalistic" as logically linked aspects of the world and as corresponding features of a theory.
Sans titreReferring to Bohr's lecture "On the unity of knowledge", Pauli mentions his misunderstandings with Bohr concerning the concept of the "detached observer", the concept of reality in atomic physics, Bohr's conception of "complementarity" as foundation of a world religion, and the use of the concept "antinomic" (antinomisch).
Sans titreHeisenberg talks about a paper by himself and Ascoli on the fine-structure constant. He comments on a paper by Källén and Glaser in which the V-particle of the Lee-model becomes radioactive, disintegrating into N and $\Theta$.
Sans titreLanczos thanks Pauli for his reply to his letter of 27 Nov, which clarifies the point in question.
Sans titrePauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 1st January. He is not convinced that dipole-"ghosts" cannot appear in Lee's model and gives some reasons for this.
Sans titreThe letter talks about the "sudden death of parity" in Wu's experiments, problems with nucleon-force data for deuterons and travel plans to Copenhagen, Zürich and Sydney.
Sans titre