Källén talks about Thirring's work on quantum electrodynamics.
Sans titreCopenhagen, Denmark
128 Description archivistique résultats pour Copenhagen, Denmark
Ever since Pauli and his wife gave the Bohrs the great pleasure of coming to Bohr's birthday, it has been on Bohr's mind to write to Pauli to say how much their friendship has meant to him during the many years, and how thankful he was again to feel how well they understand each other. Not least when one has come so far in years and has to seek the greatest joy in following the younger generations' progress, all the kindness shown to him was a very great encouragement. It was sad to hear about the death of Pauli's elderly father, and they are all sorry for the loss of Placzek and Weyl. Under these conditions Pauli's and his wife's visit to Princeton will be a great encouragement to all of them, not least for Oppenheimer, of whom they are often thinking. Bohr mentions some questions about the invitation to Lindau, he says that he and his wife plan to go there in the summer. It should be a special joy if Pauli and his wife also came.
Sans titrePauli writes about the results of his discussion (with Källén) of the motion of V- and N-particles in the Lee model, and is now more optimistic about Heisenberg's interpretation. He has questions which still have to be clarified.
Sans titreKällén enumerates various points of Heisenberg's theory, with which he does not agree.
Sans titreW. Pauli is informed that the Danish royal academy of science has elected him as an honorary member.
Sans titrePauli writes about the significance of the quantum numbers.
Sans titreHeisenberg writes about the intensity rules of Ornstein as correspondence of the correspondence principle.
Sans titreHeisenberg writes about Pauli's latest work and congratulates Pauli for all the "lies" contained in it.
Sans titreHeisenberg writes about recent developments in the formalism of quantum mechanics, perturbation theory and some results for systems with axial symmetry.
Sans titreBohr does not agree with Pauli's and Heisenberg's criticism of Thomas' work in: Nature : 117 (1926), pp. 514. He discusses the problem in detail and asks for further comments from Pauli.
Sans titre